Talk:Linking - Revision history

Rails at 01:39, 30 January 2013

2013-01-30T01:39:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 30 January 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
	:::Suggesting i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net. [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		:::Suggesting i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net. [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
			::::but.. SPARC :( <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 01:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

CuleX at 15:29, 23 January 2013

2013-01-23T15:29:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 23 January 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
	::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
	:::~~Going with~~ i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net.		:::Suggesting i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net. [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

CuleX at 15:28, 23 January 2013

2013-01-23T15:28:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 23 January 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
	::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
			:::Going with i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net.

Rails at 15:27, 23 January 2013

2013-01-23T15:27:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 23 January 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
	:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
			::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

CuleX at 15:25, 23 January 2013

2013-01-23T15:25:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 23 January 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM."		"Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM."
	Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
			:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Rails at 15:22, 23 January 2013

2013-01-23T15:22:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:22, 23 January 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	"Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM."		"Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM."
	Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB ~~maching~~/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Rails: Created page with ""Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM." Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB maching/node i..."

2013-01-23T15:19:54Z

Created page with ""Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM." Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB maching/node i..."

New page

"Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM."
Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB maching/node is a bad idea. [[User:Rails|Ra]]i[[User_talk:Rails|ls]] 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:39, 30 January 2013
Line 4:		Line 4:
	::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
	:::Suggesting i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net. [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		:::Suggesting i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net. [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
			::::but.. SPARC :( <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 01:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 23 January 2013
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
	:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)		:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX\|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX\|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
			::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails\|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails\|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)