Talk:Linking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails|ls]]</b></font> 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | :Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). [[User:CuleX|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX|talk]]) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
::just require what you can build on. i686 (and etc), x86_64, arm51, sparc. <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails|ls]]</b></font> 15:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Suggesting i686 and x86_64 for now. AFAIK nobody's tested InspIRCd on ARM and SPARC for a while. Furthermore, I don't know enough about SPARC to feel comfortable with SPARC servers on the net. [[User:CuleX|CuleX]] ([[User talk:CuleX|talk]]) 15:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
::::but.. SPARC :( <font color="#FF0000">[[User:Rails|Ra]]</font><font color="#000000">i<b>[[User_talk:Rails|ls]]</b></font> 01:39, 30 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:39, 30 January 2013
"Your server must have an x86_64 architecture CPU with at least 1GHz. Your server must have at least 256MB of RAM." Contradictory? running a 64 bit OS on a <2GB machine/node is a bad idea. Rails 15:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hm... I forgot about that conveniently when writing that up. Any suggestions to change that? We have a number of low-RAM VPS nodes after all, so it's not like we can suddenly require 2GB of RAM of new servers (which they won't even need). CuleX (talk) 15:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)